Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the ST. NICHOLAS soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of ST. NICHOLAS, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to ST. NICHOLAS were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.


Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the ST. NICHOLAS soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

There are insufficient data to create the water balance bar figure.



There are insufficient data to create the water balance line figure.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the ST. NICHOLAS series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the ST. NICHOLAS series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the ST. NICHOLAS series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with ST. NICHOLAS share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the ST. NICHOLAS series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the ST. NICHOLAS series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with ST. NICHOLAS, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing ST. NICHOLAS as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
St. Nicholas-Shakan association, 35 to 100 percent slopes34DFX42247497061nqfak64419941:31680
Grindall-St. Nicholas association, 5 to 60 percent slopes87CD20913498271nvbak64419941:31680
St. Nicholas-Kaikli complex, 5 to 75 percent slopes550CE19565497651nsbak64419941:31680
St. Nicholas-Kaikli complex, 5 to 35 percent slopes550C18937497641ns9ak64419941:31680
St. Nicholas-McGilvery complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes33D18826497021nq9ak64419941:31680
St. Nicholas very fine sandy loam, 60 to 100 percent slopes32EFX18076496951nq2ak64419941:31680
St. Nicholas-McGilvery complex, 60 to 75 percent slopes33E17287497031nqbak64419941:31680
St. Nicholas-Kaikli complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes550D16531497661nscak64419941:31680
St. Nicholas very fine sandy loam, 35 to 60 percent slopes32D15903496931nq0ak64419941:31680
St. Nicholas-Tolstoi complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes35D15689497131nqnak64419941:31680
St. Nicholas very fine sandy loam, 5 to 100 percent slopes32CFX14447496921npzak64419941:31680
St. Nicholas-McGilvery complex, 75 to 100 percent slopes33F14152497041nqcak64419941:31680
St. Nicholas very fine sandy loam, 5 to 60 percent slopes32CDX11977496911npyak64419941:31680
St. Nicholas very fine sandy loam, 60 to 75 percent slopes32E9690496941nq1ak64419941:31680
St. Nicholas-Kina complex, 5 to 35 percent slopes73C8971497921nt6ak64419941:31680
St. Nicholas-Tolstoi complex, 60 to 75 percent slopes35E7248497141nqpak64419941:31680
St. Nicholas-McGilvery complex, 5 to 35 percent slopes33C6460497001nq7ak64419941:31680
St. Nicholas-Shakan association, 75 to 100 percent slopes34F6000497081nqhak64419941:31680
St. Nicholas very fine sandy loam, 5 to 35 percent slopes32C5109496901npxak64419941:31680
St. Nicholas-Shakan association, 60 to 75 percent slopes34E4635497071nqgak64419941:31680
St. Nicholas-McGilvery complex, 5 to 100 percent slopes33CFX4509497011nq8ak64419941:31680
St. Nicholas-Kaikli complex, 60 to 75 percent slopes550E3962497671nsdak64419941:31680
St. Nicholas-Tolstoi complex, 75 to 100 percent slopes35F3834497151nqqak64419941:31680
St. Nicholas very fine sandy loam, 75 to 100 percent slopes32F3826496961nq3ak64419941:31680
St. Nicholas-Tolstoi complex, 5 to 35 percent slopes35C3547497121nqmak64419941:31680
St. Nicholas-Shakan association, 35 to 60 percent slopes34D2451497051nqdak64419941:31680
Sunnyhay-Tolstoi-St. Nicholas complex, 20 to 120 percent slopes, subalpine9663676495841nlhak64519921:31680
Tolstoi-St. Nicholas association, 35 to 75 percent slopes, subalpine54D29562495531nkhak64519921:31680
St. Nicholas loam, 35 to 65 percent slopes48D23372495431nk5ak64519921:31680
St. Nicholas-Typic Cryumbrepts, loamy-skeletal complex, 75 to 120 percent slopes55F15280495561nklak64519921:31680
Tolstoi-St. Nicholas association, 75 to 120 percent slopes, subalpine54F13548495541nkjak64519921:31680
St. Nicholas loam, 5 to 35 percent slopes48B8058495421nk4ak64519921:31680
St. Nicholas loam, 65 to 90 percent slopes48F4825495441nk6ak64519921:31680
St. Nicholas-Kaikli complex, 5 to 35 percent slopes494250495451nk7ak64519921:31680
St. Nicholas-Typic Cryumbrepts, loamy-skeletal complex, 35 to 75 percent slopes55D4028495551nkkak64519921:31680
Tolstoi-St. Nicholas association, 5 to 35 percent slopes, subalpine54B2954495521nkgak64519921:31680
Kaikli-St. Nicholas complex, broken, 36 to 55 percent slopes3694C7072500291p1vak64619921:31680
Kaikli-St. Nicholas complex, shallowly incised, 36 to 55 percent slopes3294C859499131ny3ak64619921:31680
Kaikli-St. Nicholas complex, deeply incised, 36 to 55 percent slopes3194C657498711nwrak64619921:31680
Kaikli-St. Nicholas complex, smooth, 36 to 55 percent slopes3594C502499581nzkak64619921:31680
Kaikli-St. Nicholas complex, smooth hills, 36 to 55 percent slopes4494C135500841p3mak64619921:31680

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the ST. NICHOLAS soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .